The European Council circulated a compromise text of the European Union (EU) Space Act in May 2026, advancing the regulation toward trilogue negotiations with the European Parliament and putting measurable new obligations on non-EU launch operators, satellite service providers, and downstream data distributors doing business in EU member state markets.

The draft arrived with limited fanfare in Washington. Most attention inside U.S. space company headquarters was fixed on the SpaceX initial public offering (IPO), the Golden Dome procurement schedule, and the Blue Origin New Glenn launchpad recovery timeline. EU regulatory developments rarely produce a single press release or contract announcement, and the Space Act compromise text is not that kind of document. It is a framework, but one that will determine the legal standing of every commercial U.S. space operator seeking EU revenue for the next decade.

Policy professionals, C-suite executives, and government affairs teams at U.S.-based commercial space companies face a specific decision: how early, and at what cost, to position their compliance and market-access structures for the EU Space Act regime. The May 2026 Council draft provides the clearest signal yet on what those costs look like and where the access gates are placed.

What the Council Draft Contains

The EU Space Act has been in development since the European Commission published its initial proposal in 2023. The regulation covers three primary domains: the authorization and continuous supervision of space activities by EU member states; safety and sustainability obligations for operators launching from or providing services within the EU; and the recognition, or non-recognition, of equivalent third-country regulatory frameworks.

The May 2026 Council compromise text introduced several changes from the Commission’s original proposal that directly affect non-EU operators.

First, the Council narrowed the definition of “space activities” subject to mandatory authorization. The original Commission text was read by some industry legal teams as potentially capturing any operator with EU customers or EU-routed data flows. The Council text tightens the jurisdictional hook to operators that either launch from EU territory, operate satellites registered under a member state’s International Telecommunication Union (ITU) filing, or provide regulated services from an EU-established legal entity. That narrowing matters for U.S. constellation operators structured to serve the EU through non-EU subsidiaries. While it’s not a total green light, it removes the broadest jurisdictional interpretation.

Second, the Council text maintains a provision requiring operators seeking authorization in EU member states to demonstrate “equivalent” safety and sustainability standards to those set out in the Regulation itself. For U.S. operators, equivalence recognition is not automatic. The text tasks the European Commission with negotiating bilateral equivalence arrangements with third countries, a process that has no firm timeline and that will require U.S. regulatory agencies, primarily the FAA and the FCC, to engage in a structured dialogue with the European Space Agency (ESA) and EU member state competent authorities.

Third, the Council text added a provision on in-orbit operations that the Commission’s original proposal did not include. Operators of active satellites in earth orbit, including non-EU operators, whose satellites are capable of maneuvering must register those maneuver capabilities with the relevant EU supervisory authority if they fall within defined orbital shells where EU operators also operate. This provision was added partly in response to concerns from EU satellite manufacturers about uncontrolled close approaches from large commercial constellations. It creates a new reporting obligation for U.S. mega-constellation operators that does not currently exist in U.S. domestic regulation.

The Third-Country Access Mechanism

The most commercially consequential provision for U.S. operators is Article 34 of the Council text, which governs third-country market access. Under that provision, a non-EU company can provide space services in EU member state markets through one of three pathways: establishment of an EU legal entity subject to full Regulation compliance; application to a member state competent authority for individual authorization under a third-country recognition clause; or reliance on a bilateral equivalence arrangement negotiated between the EU and the operator’s home jurisdiction.

The third pathway, bilateral equivalence, is the one most U.S. operators would prefer. It would allow a company already authorized under U.S. FAA or FCC frameworks to carry EU market access as a consequence of that authorization, without duplicating the full EU compliance stack. But the Council text makes clear that equivalence decisions are Commission-driven, not automatic, and that they require a formal assessment of whether the third country’s legal regime achieves “outcomes equivalent to” the EU Regulation’s objectives across all three domains: launch safety, satellite sustainability, and supervisory continuity.

There is no U.S.-EU bilateral space authorization agreement currently in force. The U.S. and EU have a framework dialogue on space policy under the U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council (TTC), but that body has not produced a binding equivalence arrangement in any sector. The timeline for completing one under the Space Act framework depends on when the Regulation enters into force, which itself depends on the outcome of trilogue negotiations between the Council and the Parliament, negotiations expected to begin in late 2026.

For U.S. operators that do not want to wait for a bilateral process to resolve, the practical route is EU establishment. That means creating a subsidiary, contracting with an EU-based authorized entity, or acquiring an existing EU-authorized operator. Each path carries cost and timeline implications that company legal and finance teams should be modeling now.

Read more

The Signal

When Space Systems Command (SSC) announced in late 2025 and early 2026 that it had awarded OTA prototype agreements to 12 companies for SBI development under the Golden Dome architecture, the number that traveled furthest was $3.2 billion. That figure is accurate, but it obscures something more instructive: the structure of the award tells a more specific story than the dollar amount.

OTA agreements under 10 U.S.C. § 4022 are not contracts in the traditional sense. They are not subject to the standard FAR and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) procurement requirements. They can be awarded faster, structured more flexibly, and extended to companies that would be screened out by standard contractor qualification processes. The decision to use OTA at this scale, for a program this visible, is itself a procurement signal.

And the 12 companies SSC selected signal something more specific still. The awardees include Anduril Industries, Booz Allen Hamilton, General Dynamics, GITAI USA Inc., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Quindar Inc., RTX (formerly Raytheon Technologies), Sci-Tec Inc., SpaceX, True Anomaly Inc., and Turion Space Corp. That list spans four tiers of the defense industrial base simultaneously: legacy primes, defense-adjacent technology companies, mission-specific software and analytics firms, and commercial space companies that did not exist as defense vendors five years ago.

That combination appears deliberate.

What the OTA Structure Actually Reveals

Other Transaction Authority has been used in defense acquisition for decades, but its application in space programs has accelerated sharply since 2020. The SBI awards represent one of the largest single OTA actions in Space Force history by combined ceiling value, based on publicly available Space Force announcements and Class 2 trade reporting; no consolidated historical enumeration of Space Force OTA actions by ceiling value has been published in Class 1 sources as of the research cutoff date.

The statutory rationale for OTA use is competition and speed, but procurement officers reading these awards should focus on a third reason: qualification. The FAR system’s contractor qualification requirements, particularly those tied to cost accounting standards and certified business systems, create meaningful barriers for commercial technology companies. A company like Turion Space Corp or True Anomaly Inc. operates primarily in the commercial market and may carry on its balance sheet neither the overhead structure nor the compliance infrastructure that a traditional cost-type contract requires.

OTA removes that barrier. It allows DoD to prototype with vendors who would otherwise require years of qualification investment before they could compete for a traditional program of record. The 12-company spread strongly suggests that SSC’s acquisition team identified specific technical capabilities, likely including autonomous rendezvous and proximity operations, commercial orbital logistics, and novel interceptor form factors, that could not be reliably sourced through a traditional Request for Proposal (RFP) process without narrowing the competitive field to only the established primes.

The implication for procurement officers watching from adjacent programs is direct: if you manage acquisition for a related sensing layer, a ground-based command architecture, or a logistics and servicing function that the SBI constellation will depend on, OTA is now the expected vehicle. Program offices that have not updated their acquisition strategies to include OTA-capable vendor identification will face structural disadvantage when follow-on requirements emerge.

Mapping the 12-Vendor Mix: What Each Tier Signals

Reading the vendor list as a capability map rather than a roster produces a cleaner picture of what SSC believes it needs and where it believes supply is constrained.

Tier One: Established Defense Primes and Mission Systems Architects. Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, RTX, and General Dynamics represent the traditional prime contractor base for hardware integration and manufacturing at scale. Their inclusion signals that SSC is not trying to replace the established industrial base for SBI development. It is augmenting it. The primes bring proven systems integration capability, existing classified facility infrastructure, and the manufacturing scale that prototype-to-production transitions require. RTX’s public confirmation that it is working with Rocket Lab as a subcontractor to supply launch services or components, the specific capability role has not been described in Class 1 sources as of the research cutoff date, is the first visible indication of how sub-tier teaming is forming beneath the prime layer. Booz Allen Hamilton also falls within this first tier, though its likely role is in mission systems engineering, analytics, and program management rather than interceptor hardware production; procurement officers reading the vendor list as a demand map should treat Booz Allen as a mission systems architecture signal, not a manufacturing one.

Read more

European launch vehicle company Isar Aerospace has closed a $291.6 million Series D funding round aimed at scaling orbital launch capacity for government and commercial customers worldwide.

Headquartered near Munich, Germany, Isar signed the €270 million round on June 9, 2026, with backing from new investors Island Green Capital and Molten Ventures, alongside returning investors HV Capital, Lakestar, UVC Partners, KfW Capital, and others. The company said substantial contributions came from European stakeholders, underscoring the region’s interest in developing sovereign launch capability independent of non-European providers.

The capital will fund expansion of Isar Aerospace’s serial production capability for its Spectrum launch vehicle, the buildout of a second launch site in Canada, and continued growth of what the company describes as a multinational launch network for assured access to space.

“Space is no longer a frontier; it is the infrastructure of national power,” said Daniel Metzler, Co-Founder and CEO of Isar Aerospace. “With this strategic backing, we are expanding access to space for nations worldwide, delivering an orbital launch system at scale for government and commercial customers.”

The company’s production facility in Parsdorf, near Munich, is designed to manufacture up to 40 Spectrum launch vehicles per year. The plant employs a high degree of automation and vertical integration, covering design, manufacturing, and testing largely in-house — a configuration the company says is critical to meeting both cost and schedule targets for a high-cadence launch program.

Isar Aerospace has signed a Letter of Intent with Maritime Launch Services to add Spaceport Nova Scotia in Canada as a second launch site, alongside the company’s existing complex at Andøya Space in Norway. Together, the two facilities are intended to serve mid- to high-inclination orbits — the regime used for Earth observation and communications missions favored by government customers. Additional sites are under negotiation, though the company did not identify specific locations.

The company has also entered a cooperation agreement with TKMS as part of the Canadian Patrol Submarine Project, embedding a sovereign launch capability inside a NATO bilateral defense procurement framework. That arrangement reflects a broader shift in Isar Aerospace’s customer mix. Within the past 12 months, the company said it moved from predominantly civil demand to a customer base that is now 60% defense oriented.

That shift comes against a backdrop of a documented access gap. Europe conducted fewer than 10 orbital launches in 2025. The United States conducted more than 190 over the same period. The SPARTA 2.0 report, published in May 2026, named sovereign European access to space as a central capability gap that Europe must address on the path to autonomous capacity to act.

Isar Aerospace’s launch manifest now extends well through 2028, with booked missions for the European Space Agency, the Norwegian Space Agency, ElevationSpace, Astroscale, and other commercial and government customers.

The funding announcement comes as the company prepares its qualification flight — Mission “Onward and Upward” — carrying five CubeSats and one experiment for ESA’s Boost! Program. The launch window from Andøya Space opens June 15 and runs through June 21, subject to weather, safety, and range availability. Isar Aerospace was founded in 2018 and has grown to more than 400 employees across five international locations. Eden Global Capital Partners served as exclusive financial advisor on the financing.

(Source: Isar Aerospace news release. Image provided)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

Starfish Space has selected Gilmour Space Technologies as the docking partner for its Otter Pup 2 on-orbit demonstration mission, targeting a docking attempt in the coming months.

Otter Pup 2 launched in June 2025 to demonstrate rendezvous, proximity operations, and docking technologies in low Earth orbit. Following a series of successful rendezvous tests, Starfish Space chose the Gold Coast, Australia-based company for the next phase of the program.

The mission will have Otter Pup 2 perform rendezvous and proximity operations with Gilmour Space’s ElaraSat MMS-1 satellite ahead of the planned docking attempt.

“Docking and proximity operations are among the most technically challenging activities in spaceflight,” said Starfish Space Co-Founder Trevor Bennett. “These capabilities, and the services they enable, are becoming increasingly important as space-based infrastructure scales.”

Bennett said Gilmour Space’s satellite capability and operational approach made them a strong fit for the demonstration. “They have proven to be great partners to date,” he said.

Mark Grimminck, Gilmour Space Head of Satellites, said the selection validated work underway at the Australian company. “Being selected as the docking partner for this mission is an exciting opportunity for Gilmour Space and a strong endorsement of the satellite capability we’re developing here in Australia,” Grimminck said.

The collaboration gives Gilmour Space’s satellite and mission operations teams operational experience and flight heritage on proximity and docking procedures. The company is also developing the Eris launch vehicle and operates the Bowen Orbital Spaceport.

Starfish Space said further details about the mission timeline and docking campaign will be announced in the coming months.

(Source: Gilmour Space Technologies news release image provided)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

Microgravity manufacturing aboard the International Space Station has produced artificial retinas with measurably better optical performance than those made on Earth, a biotechnology company announced June 10.

LambdaVision, a biotech startup, has conducted nine investigations on the ISS over the past decade, building and refining an automated production system designed to manufacture a protein-based artificial retina at commercial scale. The device is constructed from hundreds of layers of a light-activated protein.

On Earth, gravity-driven forces — sedimentation and buoyancy — cause uneven layering during production. The result is raw material waste and a ceiling on scalability. In microgravity, those forces are eliminated, and the manufacturing process performs differently.

Artificial retinas produced aboard the station show improved uniformity, optical performance, and reproducibility compared to those made on the ground, according to the ISS National Laboratory, which sponsored the research. They also demonstrate enhanced stability and biocompatibility while consuming less raw material per unit produced.

Working with ISS National Lab implementation partner Space Tango, LambdaVision developed a compact, automated production system housed inside Space Tango’s CubeLab hardware on the station. The hardware operates without crew intervention, running the layering process autonomously in orbit. The ISS campaign also allowed the team to refine automation routines, fault detection, and quality control protocols — steps the company said are required before pursuing regulatory clearance.

“Through our flight projects on the ISS, we’ve taken a lot of the risk out of demonstrating the value of manufacturing in space,” said Nicole Wagner, CEO of LambdaVision.

The company’s target patient populations are those with age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa. Both conditions currently have no cure. Together they affect more than 200 million people worldwide.

Age-related macular degeneration degrades the central retina, impairing reading, driving, and facial recognition. Retinitis pigmentosa is an inherited disorder that progressively destroys photoreceptor cells. LambdaVision’s device is designed to replace the function of those damaged cells using the protein bacteriorhodopsin, which responds to light and can generate the electrical signals the eye normally sends to the brain. The company has not disclosed clinical trial timelines or regulatory filing dates.

LambdaVision’s next ISS investigation is scheduled to launch later this year. That mission will focus on increasing production volume and further optimizing the manufacturing process — moving the program from proof-of-concept demonstration toward the output levels needed for a viable commercial supply chain.

The company has also reserved capacity on Starlab, the commercial space station under development by Voyager Space and Airbus, to continue in-orbit manufacturing after the ISS is retired — currently planned for the end of the decade. That reservation positions LambdaVision to maintain continuity of its orbital production platform through the transition from government-operated to commercially operated stations.

“We’re now thinking about how we scale in orbit and what’s next as we transition from the ISS to other platforms in the future,” Wagner said.

The ISS National Laboratory is managed by the Center for the Advancement of Science in Space under a cooperative agreement with NASA. It provides access to the station’s unique environment for research in life sciences, materials science, and manufacturing. Space Tango, a Kentucky-based company, operates CubeLab hardware aboard the station and provides end-to-end services for automated on-orbit research and manufacturing.

The LambdaVision program represents one of the more advanced manufacturing use cases to emerge from the ISS National Lab’s commercial portfolio, in that it targets a regulated medical device rather than a research sample. How the company navigates the path from on-orbit production to FDA-approved product — and what manufacturing infrastructure that path requires — will determine whether the space environment becomes part of a permanent supply chain or remains a development tool.

(Source: ISS National Laboratory news release. Image provided)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

The Signal

In early 2025, the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) published a study identifying nine categories of highly specialized components where the space manufacturing supply chain faces a serious production capacity deficit. The list drew predictable attention to the headline items: rocket motor nozzles, optical intersatellite link (OISL) hardware, and radiation-hardened chips. What received far less notice was the finding that the constraint is not always in the component itself. For several of the nine categories, the bottleneck sits one step downstream, in the finishing and certification processes that determine whether a fabricated part is qualified to fly.

Post-processing is the unglamorous final mile of space hardware manufacturing. It includes chemical conversion coatings, anodizing, physical vapor deposition (PVD) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) hard coatings, electroless nickel plating, passivation of stainless-steel and titanium alloys, thermal spray processes, and specialized paint and adhesive systems qualified for vacuum outgassing. None of these processes are exotic in industrial terms. What makes them rare in the space context is the certification overhead: every process that touches flight hardware must be traceable to a qualified process specification, the facility must maintain an active approval from the relevant government or prime customer, and the process chemistry must be controlled to tolerances that ordinary commercial processors do not maintain.

The result is a supplier landscape where the fabrication work is often widely distributed but the post-processing work flows through a very small number of certified facilities, many of them running at or near capacity, and almost none of them visible in standard program risk reviews.

The Supply Chain Map

Certification Regimes That Create the Bottleneck

The core mechanism producing supplier concentration in space post-processing is the certification regime, not the technology itself. Three overlapping qualification frameworks govern most of the work:

Military specifications and standards. The Department of Defense (DoD) maintains process specifications under the military specification (MIL-SPEC) family that govern surface treatments on flight hardware. MIL-DTL-5541 governs chemical conversion coatings on aluminum, the most common structural metal in satellite and launch vehicle structures. MIL-A-8625 governs anodizing. MIL-DTL-23053 and related documents govern heat-shrink and insulation materials. Maintaining active qualification to these documents requires documented process control, periodic re-qualification testing, and acceptance by the prime or government customer. A commercial metal-finishing shop can perform chromate conversion coatings, but unless it has maintained its DoD-qualified process status and can provide traceable documentation, its work is not accepted on defense or National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) programs.

NASA process specifications. NASA maintains its own process specification library through the NASA Technical Standards Program. Documents such as MSFC-SPEC-522 (welding), NASA-STD-6001 (flammability, offgassing, and compatibility), and process approvals flowing through prime contractors add a parallel set of qualification requirements. NASA-STD-6001 outgassing requirements alone eliminate most commercial coating vendors, because the test protocol requires process-specific data, not just generic material data, and the test is not trivial to run or maintain.

AS9100 and NADCAP. NADCAP provides third-party audit accreditation for special processes used in aerospace and defense. NADCAP accreditation in chemical processing, coatings, and heat treating is considered table stakes for most prime contractors when sourcing post-processing. Achieving and maintaining NADCAP accreditation requires dedicated quality management resources, controlled process chemistry, and recurring third-party audits. The program has merit: it has standardized process quality across the industry. It has also raised the bar for entry to a point where, based on industry trade reporting, many regional metal-finishing shops that could technically perform the work have declined to pursue accreditation because the administrative burden does not pencil out at the volumes they handle.

The combination of MIL-SPEC qualification, NASA process approvals, and NADCAP accreditation means that a vendor serving space programs must maintain three overlapping compliance frameworks simultaneously, and must do so continuously, because a lapse in any of them can trigger a re-qualification process that takes months and effectively sidelines the vendor for new program work during that period.

Read more

The United States has begun enrolling foreign governments into its Traffic Coordination System for Space, marking the first expansion of the system beyond commercial satellite operators.

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Office of Space Commerce opened National Government Account access as part of its broader effort to build a global space situational awareness coordination framework under Space Policy Directive-3, which directed Commerce to provide space traffic safety data and services to operators worldwide.

The United Kingdom and Australia are the first two governments to onboard as National Government Account users. The accounts are read-only, giving each country access to space safety information for all spacecraft affiliated with their nation.

As of now, TraCSS — the Traffic Coordination System for Space — has 52 pilot users across 21 countries actively onboarded onto the system. Together, those users account for more than 11,000 spacecraft in orbit.

TraCSS launched its direct satellite owner/operator registration process in early 2026 through the TraCSS.gov webpage. The National Government Account tier supplements that pilot program and is intended to give countries visibility into their national spaceflight safety situation without requiring an operational role in the system.

“OSC and the TraCSS team recognize the critical role of international coordination to keep space safe,” said Dr. Mariel Borowitz, OSC’s Head of International SSA Engagement. “TraCSS National Government Accounts give countries a tool to improve their awareness of spaceflight safety and better coordinate with others around the world.”

The system is positioned to become an open, transparent resource for global spacecraft operators. The Office of Space Commerce is also working with EUSST — the European Union Space Surveillance and Tracking program — on data standards covering notification thresholds and service scope. That collaboration reflects the effort to align U.S. and European SSA frameworks as the number of tracked objects in orbit continues to grow.

TraCSS remains in a pilot evaluation phase. Governments interested in joining as National Government Account users can contact the TraCSS Outreach team.

(Source: Office of Space Commerce. AI Generated Image)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

Los Angeles satellite bus manufacturer Apex has closed a $200 million funding round that nearly doubles its valuation to $2.3 billion, less than a year after first crossing the $1 billion mark.

Glade Brook Capital Partners led the round, with Washington Harbour Partners co-leading. New and existing investors also participated. The announcement was made June 5, 2026.

The funding comes as demand for proliferated low Earth orbit constellations — both commercial and national security — continues to stretch the production capacity of spacecraft manufacturers. Apex was founded in 2022 specifically to address that bottleneck by building satellite bus platforms ahead of customer orders, rather than on a bespoke, contract-by-contract basis.

“This raise is all about scaling the business to meet the demand Max and I highlighted when we founded Apex, which has continued to grow in the subsequent years,” said Ian Cinnamon, CEO and Co-Founder of Apex. “Proliferation is the name of the game these days, and it’s only possible with suppliers like Apex that can actually execute on their model to build satellites at an industrial scale.”

Apex will use the new capital to expand its Factory One manufacturing campus in Los Angeles, adding 30,000 square feet of floor space. The facility is currently capable of producing more than 200 satellites per year at peak capacity. The company’s headcount has more than doubled in the past year to over 350 employees.

The company also announced the appointment of Michael Kopet as Chief Financial Officer. Kopet joins from Axon, where he served as Vice President of Finance.

The round drew in investors who pointed to Apex’s manufacturing model as the attraction. “Space is undergoing a fundamental transition from bespoke programs to scalable, proliferated infrastructure,” said Paul Hudson, Founder and Chief Investment Officer at Glade Brook Capital Partners. “Apex has built exactly the kind of business needed to support that shift.”

Washington Harbour Partners’ co-lead position reflects a similar read on the market. “We believe Apex is defining a new category within the aerospace and defense industry,” said Mina Faltas, Founder and Chief Investment Officer at Washington Harbour Partners. “The company’s productized approach to spacecraft manufacturing, combined with its speed, commitment to reliability, and growing production capacity, positions Apex to become a foundational partner for the next generation of proliferated constellations and resilient space architectures.”

Apex’s three satellite platforms — Aries, Nova, and Comet — are designed for missions in both LEO and geostationary orbit, with payload capacity reaching up to 6,614 pounds on the recently announced Mini configuration of the Comet platform. Customer missions in the pipeline cover remote sensing, communications, in-space power generation, and proliferated national security architectures.

On the defense side, Apex is collaborating with Northrop Grumman on space-based interceptor capabilities for the U.S. Space Force under the broader Golden Dome for America initiative. The work centers on Orbital Magazines — spacecraft designed to host and support space-based interceptors.

Project Shadow, the satellite platform hosting America’s first commercially led on-orbit space-based interceptor demonstration, remains on track for a summer 2026 launch. The mission is designed to validate core technologies underlying the Orbital Magazine architecture.

Later this year, a handful of Apex satellites are also scheduled to reach orbit, adding to flight heritage the company built from its first Aries satellite, which launched two years ago and continues to operate in LEO.

(Source: Apex news release. Image from file)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

Two companies are combining electronics hardware expertise and low Earth orbit navigation technology in a new agreement to develop positioning and timing solutions for industries where conventional GPS consistently falls short.

Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Xona Space Systems, Inc. signed a memorandum of understanding to jointly develop products and solutions that integrate Murata’s component capabilities with Xona’s LEO-based positioning, navigation, and timing service, known as Pulsar.

Positioning, navigation, and timing — collectively referred to as PNT — is foundational infrastructure for modern communications networks, industrial equipment, autonomous mobility, and consumer devices. Most of that infrastructure today runs through the Global Navigation Satellite System, or GNSS, which relies on satellites orbiting in medium Earth orbit. Those satellites circle between roughly 1,240 and 22,370 miles above Earth.

That distance creates a persistent set of problems. Signals arriving from MEO satellites are relatively weak by the time they reach the ground. In dense urban environments, buildings block and scatter those signals, reducing accuracy and availability. The systems are also increasingly vulnerable to deliberate interference — jamming that overwhelms receivers and spoofing that feeds false position data.

LEO satellites orbit between approximately 310 and 1,240 miles above Earth. At that altitude, signals arrive with greater strength. The faster orbital speed of LEO satellites also means receivers can collect observation data more quickly, which shortens the time needed to resolve an accurate position fix and reduces the positioning errors caused by signal reflections in urban canyons.

Xona’s Pulsar network is designed from the ground up as a dedicated PNT service, not a broadband communications constellation repurposed for navigation. The company says Pulsar targets centimeter-level positioning accuracy and is built to be compatible with existing GNSS receivers. Users would integrate Pulsar signals alongside their current GPS or GNSS equipment rather than rip and replace existing hardware.

Murata brings a different set of capabilities to the collaboration. The Japanese electronics manufacturer has long-standing expertise in high-frequency and wireless communications components, sensors, timing devices, and multi-function module design. Those technologies sit at the intersection of what a ground-based PNT receiver needs to translate satellite signals into actionable data.

Under the MOU, the two companies will explore how Murata’s hardware portfolio can be combined with Pulsar’s LEO signal architecture to produce products and solutions optimized for specific industrial applications.

Two market segments have been identified as near-term priorities. The first is data centers and financial institutions. Both sectors depend on highly accurate timing synchronization — data centers to coordinate distributed computing loads, and financial firms to timestamp transactions with precision required under regulatory frameworks. As 5G networks expand and 6G development advances, that timing dependency grows more acute.

The second target sector is off-road industrial machinery, including construction equipment and agricultural vehicles. These machines operate in environments where tree canopy, terrain, and the absence of cellular infrastructure already complicate GNSS use. A LEO-based PNT layer with stronger signals and faster convergence times would address a gap that has limited the deployment of autonomous and precision-guided systems in those sectors.

The MOU formalizes what has been an ongoing relationship. Murata invested in Xona through WONDERSTONE Ventures, its corporate venture capital arm, prior to the signing. The new agreement moves that financial relationship into active joint product development.

Murata has identified the space domain as a growth area. The company said it intends to continue advancing foundational technologies in positioning and timing synchronization as part of a broader strategy to contribute to communications and industrial infrastructure development.

Financial terms and a development timeline were not disclosed.

(Source: Murata Manufacturing news release)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

The first Starship-class orbital data center platform has a name, a 2028 pathfinder delivery date, and a 100 kW power architecture. The sub-tier supply chain it requires does not yet exist at that scale.

Muon Space unveiled Condor-Ultra on June 3, 2026, a Starship-class spacecraft platform designed for data-center-class compute, with a scalable power architecture ranging from 20 kW to 100 kW future variants. Sub-tier manufacturers serving terrestrial hyperscalers are not qualified for the radiation environment, vacuum thermal cycling, or power-density constraints that Condor-Ultra demands. The gap between terrestrial data center specs and orbital data center requirements is a sourcing problem with no current solution on the shelf.

Muon Space unveiled Condor-Ultra on June 3, 2026, at its Mountain View, California headquarters. The platform is a Starship-class spacecraft designed for high-power, networked constellations and optimized for stackable mass-deployment from SpaceX’s Starship. Condor-Ultra features a 20 kW initial power architecture with variants scaling to 100 kW, over 18 square meters of nadir payload area, 100 Gbps intersatellite optical mesh networking, and integration with the NVIDIA Space-1 Vera Rubin Module, a purpose-built AI inference platform for orbital workloads that Muon Space states delivers up to 25 times the compute performance of an H100 GPU for space applications. The first pathfinder mission is slated for delivery in 2028.

The FAA granted test flight approval to SpaceX’s Starfall in-orbit manufacturing vehicle in June 2026. Starfall is designed to operate in the Starship payload bay, a pressurized volume larger than any previously flown commercial spacecraft, and its approval opens a near-term qualification window for orbital manufacturing and computing infrastructure that did not exist twelve months ago.

Condor-Ultra’s power, thermal, and networking architecture is designed, in Muon Space’s own description, to meet the unique demands of orbital data centers: scalable power generation, high-density compute workloads, and autonomous mission, network, and data operations at constellation scale. Those three requirements define a sub-tier supply chain problem that no hyperscale data center supplier is currently positioned to fill without significant redesign.

The Signal

The FAA’s test flight approval for Starfall is the regulatory triggering event. It establishes that a large-format Starship-class payload with manufacturing or computing functions can progress through regulatory review, and sets a precedent that orbital industrial platforms, not just launch vehicles, can receive FAA authorization as test articles. Combined with Muon Space’s June 3 Condor-Ultra announcement, the argument for an orbital computing platform has moved from speculative to commercially staged within a defined 24-to-36-month development window.

Condor-Ultra is not the only orbital computing architecture under development. Amazon Web Services (AWS) has maintained a quiet interest in orbital edge computing through its relationship with Amazon Leo. Microsoft Azure has invested in Azure Space, which includes orbital processing capabilities. Neither company has disclosed a Starship-class platform design as of June 2026. Muon Space, by virtue of the Condor-Ultra announcement, its published architecture work, and its documented feasibility work with hyperscalers on large-scale AI infrastructure in orbit, represents the most concrete Starship-class orbital data center program currently visible to the market.

The sub-tier procurement question is not hypothetical. Condor-Ultra at its full 100 kW variant, confirmed in Muon Space’s June 3 press release, requires solar array output, vacuum thermal rejection, and radiation-tolerant AI inferencing hardware at scales that no currently catalogued commercial supplier is qualified to fill. Supply chain managers at companies serving this market need to begin qualification planning now, before the program reaches a procurement readiness review ahead of its 2028 pathfinder delivery date.

Read more

A new industry-academia collaboration aimed at improving scientific understanding of what happens to Earth’s atmosphere when satellites burn up on reentry has launched, with Astroscale Holdings Inc. as convener and Planet Labs PBC and the University of Southampton as founding participants.

The initiative, called Atmospheric Impact of Reentered Spacecraft, or AIRS, was announced June 9. While space sustainability efforts have historically focused on in-orbit operations and debris removal, the atmospheric effects of reentry remain an underexplored area. During reentry, spacecraft are exposed to extreme heating and interaction with atmospheric gases, leading to melting, fragmentation, and vaporization of materials. Those processes release chemical compounds at various layers of the upper atmosphere — altitudes where direct measurement is difficult and modeling has historically depended on incomplete assumptions about spacecraft construction.

As activity in low Earth orbit accelerates, the number of satellites reentering Earth’s atmosphere is expected to rise significantly. Current simulations rely on simplified spacecraft assumptions because actual manufacturing data has not been widely available to researchers. Without access to real-world industry data, the results of advanced academic modeling carry limits on relevance and applicability. AIRS is designed to address that gap.

Under the initiative, space operators and manufacturers will share non-proprietary spacecraft design information with academic researchers to improve atmospheric modeling accuracy while protecting commercially sensitive data. Material composition and approximate mass breakdowns can be shared under confidential bilateral agreements. More detailed data — including component layouts or expected reentry profiles — may be shared at each participant’s discretion.

Astroscale will both coordinate the initiative and contribute its own spacecraft data alongside Planet. Planet brings expertise in Earth observation, satellite manufacturing, and operations. The University of Southampton contributes research capabilities in aerospace engineering and atmospheric science. Together, the three founding participants aim to expand access to actual spacecraft data, reduce uncertainty in atmospheric modeling, and support evidence-based decision-making for the future of low Earth orbit.

“Spacecraft reentry has long been treated as an optimal mission endpoint, but it is increasingly clear that we need a deeper scientific understanding of what happens during this phase,” said Mike Lindsay, Chief Technology Officer at Astroscale. “By enabling industry to contribute real-world data in a trusted way, AIRS removes critical barriers for atmospheric research and ensures space sustainability is guided with the most accurate and up-to-date information.”

Planet’s chief space officer framed the company’s participation around its core mission. “Our mission to make global change visible starts with a deep responsibility for the space environment in which we operate,” said James Mason. “Sustainable space operations must account for a satellite’s entire lifecycle, including its eventual reentry. By providing data to the AIRS initiative, we are helping the scientific community move past simulations and toward a factual, data-driven understanding of our industry’s atmospheric footprint.”

Minkwan Kim, Professor at the University of Southampton, pointed to data scarcity as the problem AIRS is built to solve. “A primary challenge in assessing the effects of re-entry emissions on the upper atmosphere is the scarcity of high-quality data required for robust modeling and evidence-based analysis,” Kim said. “AIRS will address this critical gap, improving our understanding and mitigation of atmospheric re-entry ablation impacts, and ensuring that the benefits of space remain accessible to future generations.”

No additional members beyond the three founding participants have been announced. The initiative’s structure — centered on bilateral confidentiality agreements rather than a single shared data pool — is designed to lower the barrier for future industry participants to contribute spacecraft data on their own terms.

(Source: Astroscale and Planet Lab news releases. Image provided by Astroscale)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

The National Reconnaissance Office has modified an existing contract with BlackSky Technology to accelerate development of the company’s AROS broad-area collection satellite constellation as a commercial alternative to current foundation imagery suppliers.

The contract modification funds a direct path to a flight-ready multi-spectral, large-area mapping spacecraft and an accompanying foundation data collection system by 2028. The Herndon, Virginia-based company, publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange as BKSY, will build the new satellites on its proven Gen-3 architecture platform using vertically integrated manufacturing infrastructure.

The award addresses an anticipated gap in the commercial foundation imagery market. Aging large-area collection satellites from existing providers are expected to go out of service in the coming years, creating a window for new suppliers — and a continuity-of-supply risk for government and commercial customers who rely on baseline geospatial data for mapping, navigation and defense applications.

“Developing BlackSky’s AROS constellation in partnership with the U.S. government cements a major step in securing U.S. global space competitiveness, resilience and maintaining critical operational continuity as commercially available foundation data becomes capacity-constrained in the coming years,” said Brian O’Toole, BlackSky CEO.

AROS is designed to support country-scale digital mapping, navigation, maritime situational awareness and 3D digital twin applications. The system will operate as an integrated extension of BlackSky’s existing fleet, incorporating the company’s space, software and platform stack.

The new satellites are intended to complement rather than replace BlackSky’s current Gen-3 constellation. Once on orbit, the two systems are designed to work in a tip-and-cue workflow: large-area AROS surveillance identifies activity of interest, which then drives high-frequency, targeted monitoring by the Gen-3 fleet at national and regional scale.

AI-enabled analytics aboard the combined system are designed to detect and characterize aircraft, vessels and vehicles, delivering real-time strategic and tactical insights over broad geographic areas. That analytical layer is central to the use cases BlackSky is targeting: dynamic country-scale monitoring, maritime domain awareness and the automated generation of Earth digital twin systems used for planning and simulation.

“AROS will provide an optimal balance between leap-ahead technology capabilities at very competitive speed and economics and fill anticipated market gaps as aging commercial large area collection satellites come out of service,” O’Toole said.

Underpinning the system is a new proprietary data pipeline designed to feed real-time and retrospective AI analytics, model training and decision support tools. The pipeline is also expected to support automated feature extraction and the automated production of navigation safety applications — areas of growing demand across commercial aviation and maritime sectors.

BlackSky said the AROS foundation enterprise is designed for deployment and integration into customer workflows within a relatively short timeframe following on-orbit commissioning. The company did not disclose the financial terms of the contract modification.

The award builds on BlackSky’s existing NRO relationship. It also follows a separate seven-figure, multi-year contract renewal the company received to accelerate automation of future non-Earth imagery services, and a seven-figure subscription contract with a new government customer for advanced Gen-2 mission applications.

Foundation imagery — the baseline, large-area geospatial data used to build maps, navigation databases and change-detection models — has historically been concentrated among a small number of commercial satellite operators. The NRO’s decision to fund BlackSky’s AROS development reflects the agency’s interest in building commercial alternatives before existing capacity erodes. The contract modification does not name those incumbent providers.

With the 2028 system readiness target now funded, BlackSky’s next visible milestone will be demonstrating the multi-spectral spacecraft design against that schedule.

(Source: BlackSky news release. Image provided)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

Engineered bacteria sent to the International Space Station to produce a radiation-shielding pigment failed to absorb nutrients normally in microgravity, a finding that researchers say identifies both the core obstacle and a potential path forward for manufacturing biological materials in orbit.

The results come from the Melanized Microbes for Multiple Uses in Space project, known as MELSP, which launched to the ISS in November 2023. The research was sponsored by the ISS National Laboratory and published in the journal npj Microgravity.

Zheng Wang, principal investigator of MELSP and a research biologist at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, said the findings cut to the heart of what must be solved before microbial production in space becomes viable.

“The biggest takeaway is that if we want to manufacture materials using microbes in space, we have to solve the issue of how nutrients get into cells,” Wang said.

The MELSP team engineered strains of Escherichia coli, the workhorse bacterium of industrial biotechnology, to produce melanin. The pigment blocks radiation, neutralizes harmful chemicals, and remains stable under extreme temperature and pressure conditions. Those properties make melanin a candidate material for protecting both astronauts and spacecraft systems on long-duration missions beyond low Earth orbit, where resupply from Earth becomes increasingly costly and infrequent.

The engineered bacteria carried the complete genetic pathway for melanin synthesis. In microgravity, however, the spaceflight environment disrupted how cells absorbed nutrients and responded to metabolic stress. After the flight, researchers found that much of a key nutrient remained unused, indicating the bacteria could not take in what they needed to complete the production process. The genetic machinery was present and functioning. The raw material simply was not reaching it.

Ground-based testing reinforced the finding. Collaborator Cheryl Nickerson, a microbiologist at Arizona State University, conducted parallel experiments using a NASA-developed Rotating Wall Vessel bioreactor, a device designed to simulate certain aspects of microgravity fluid dynamics on the ground. Those experiments produced patterns consistent with what was observed aboard the ISS, pointing to nutrient transport and fluid mixing as the central engineering challenges for microbial production in weightless environments.

Without the convective mixing that gravity drives in Earth-based bioreactors, nutrient gradients form around cells. The bacteria sit in a depleted microenvironment even when the surrounding medium contains adequate supply. Solving that problem, the research suggests, will require active circulation systems designed specifically for microgravity conditions.

The investigation also included fungal strains selected for their resilience in extreme environments. All fungal samples survived spaceflight and continued producing steady levels of melanin throughout the mission, a result that stood in contrast to the bacterial performance. That outcome positions fungi as candidates for future space-based biomanufacturing applications, though the MELSP research did not define a development timeline or commercial pathway for fungal production systems.

The bacterial and fungal results together help define the design requirements for the next generation of biological production systems built for use in orbit. Future bioreactors may need to actively circulate nutrients, manage cellular stress, and compensate for the absence of gravity-driven fluid dynamics that terrestrial cells rely on. The findings give engineers a specific problem to solve rather than a general performance gap to close.

Materials produced through microbial processes in orbit could eventually include radiation-shielding compounds, medicines, and other consumables needed during deep-space missions, reducing dependence on Earth resupply. The economics of that production model depend on demonstrating reliable yields in a microgravity environment. MELSP did not achieve that with its bacterial strains, but the research team characterized the barrier as an engineering problem rather than a fundamental biological one.

The MELSP findings are reported in the current issue of Upward, the official magazine of the ISS National Laboratory. The full research paper appears in npj Microgravity.

(Source: ISS National Laboratory news release. Image provided)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

AST SpaceMobile has scheduled a Falcon 9 rocket launch for June 17 to carry three next-generation BlueBird satellites, numbers 8, 9, and 10, to low Earth orbit, adding to a growing constellation designed to deliver cellular broadband directly to standard smartphones.

The launch window opens at 2:39 a.m. EDT from Cape Canaveral, Florida, with additional opportunities available until 4:15 a.m. A live broadcast will stream on AST SpaceMobile’s YouTube channel on launch day.

BlueBirds 8, 9, and 10 are built on the company’s next-generation stackable satellite architecture, incorporating advanced composite carbon structures designed to support efficient multi-satellite launches and accelerated constellation deployment. The architecture is part of what AST SpaceMobile calls a multi-provider launch strategy, intended to give the company flexibility as it builds out global coverage. In practical terms, that means the company is not exclusively tied to any single rocket vendor, a hedge against launch delays and pricing pressure that has tripped up other constellation operators.

Each of the three satellites carries a commercial communications array measuring approximately 2,400 square feet, the same footprint as the in-orbit BlueBird 6. AST SpaceMobile describes these as the largest commercial communications arrays ever deployed in low Earth orbit. The new satellites are expected to deliver nearly double the peak data speeds of the company’s initial Block 1 BlueBird satellites, which recently recorded peak download speeds of 98.9 Mbps directly to standard, unmodified smartphones. No specialized terminal is required to receive service.

“Our upcoming launch marks another important milestone as we continue advancing the deployment of our space-based cellular broadband network,” said Scott Wisniewski, President of AST SpaceMobile. “Each BlueBird satellite launched expands our ability to support seamless space-based broadband mobile connectivity directly to everyday smartphones.”

Wisniewski said the next-generation satellites, combined with the company’s expanding manufacturing capabilities, “position AST SpaceMobile to continue scaling toward continuous global space-based cellular broadband coverage supported by a diversified launch strategy.”

AST SpaceMobile designed and built approximately 95% of its technology in-house. The company employs more than 2,250 people and operates more than 500,000 square feet of manufacturing and operations facilities globally. That level of vertical integration is intended to give the company direct control over production timelines and satellite performance, and to reduce dependence on third-party component suppliers whose own schedules can introduce delays.

The Midland, Texas-based company’s stated goal is to provide voice, data, and video broadband service via satellite directly to everyday devices, without specialized terminals or additional hardware, to users in areas where terrestrial wireless coverage is absent or limited. The company describes its target market as the billions of mobile subscribers worldwide who remain unconnected or under-connected, a number it puts at nearly 6 billion globally.

AST SpaceMobile currently holds service agreements with nearly 60 mobile network operators representing more than 3 billion combined subscribers. Strategic partners include AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, Rakuten, Google, Bell, Telus, stc Group, and American Tower. The breadth of that partner network matters for regulatory clearance as much as for commercial reach: spectrum access approvals are typically tied to in-country operator relationships.

The company said it anticipates hosting an in-person investor launch event at Cape Canaveral for a future mission carrying BlueBird 11 through 13 satellites. For the June 17 launch, the public and investors are directed to the company’s YouTube live stream.

Exact launch timing remains subject to change based on launch provider readiness, weather conditions, and other factors, many of which AST SpaceMobile noted are outside its control.

(Source: AST SpaceMobile news release. Image from file)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

A commercial agreement between Vast and the European Space Agency, acting on behalf of the Czech Republic, will send a Czech astronaut to the International Space Station for the first time, pending approval by the five-partner Multilateral Crew Operations Panel.

Under the agreement, ESA reserve astronaut Aleš Svoboda is named as mission pilot, building on a memorandum of understanding Vast and the Czech Republic signed in 2024. The mission is planned for 2027, with SpaceX providing transportation aboard a Dragon spacecraft launched on a Falcon 9 rocket.

The Multilateral Crew Operations Panel, which includes representatives from NASA, ESA, Roscosmos, JAXA, and the Canadian Space Agency, must reach consensus before the flight assignment is confirmed. No approval date has been announced.

Svoboda, one of 12 ESA astronaut reserve members selected in November 2022, is slated to serve alongside ESA Astronaut Thomas Pesquet, named Commander for the mission.

“This mission is an important milestone for the Czech Republic and a strategic investment into our future technological capabilities, science, industry, and education. Space technologies already influence many sectors with high added value, from telecommunications and cybersecurity to manufacturing. Through this mission, we want to strengthen the Czech Republic’s industrial and technological base, support the involvement of Czech companies and research institutions in top international projects, and inspire a new generation of engineers, scientists, and innovators,” said Karel Havlíček, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic.

The mission would mark the third time ESA has arranged commercial access to space for a member state. Josef Aschbacher, ESA’s Director General, cited NASA’s role: “We thank NASA for its effort in facilitating this commercial activity. It supports the Czech Republic’s ambitions while reinforcing Europe’s broader objectives in exploration, innovation, and long-term capability development.”

“The Czech Republic has demonstrated a strong commitment to advancing its role in the global space economy, and we look forward to working closely with ESA, NASA, and the Czech Ministry of Industry and Trade on this historic mission,” said Max Haot, CEO of Vast.

The agreement is the latest in a series of national deals for Vast, which earlier this year signed a two-mission agreement with the French government covering an ISS flight and a crewed seat on Haven-1, the company’s commercial space station targeted for launch in 2027.

(Source: Vast news release. Image provided)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

The inner cooling and ventilation layer of the next-generation lunar spacesuit to be worn by NASA astronauts on the Moon was unveiled in New York City on June 7 by Axiom Space and Prada.

The garment, the Liquid Cooling and Ventilation Garment, or LCVG, is engineered as the innermost layer of the Axiom Extravehicular Mobility Unit, known as the AxEMU. It is designed to keep astronauts thermally regulated and able to breathe during spacewalks of up to eight hours on the lunar surface. Axiom Space holds the NASA contract to develop the AxEMU for the Artemis program, which is targeting a crewed lunar landing on Artemis IV.

The two companies first announced their collaboration in 2023. In 2024, they unveiled the AxEMU’s outer shell, built to survive the thermal extremes and micrometeoroid environment of the lunar South Pole. The LCVG represents the next phase, moving from the suit’s protective exterior to the layer worn closest to the astronaut’s body, where thermal regulation, comfort, and reliability carry the most direct life-safety consequences.

The LCVG performs two functions. During a spacewalk, it circulates cold water through a network of tubes routed across the body’s major muscle groups, absorbing metabolic heat and carrying it away to the suit’s portable life-support system, where it is expelled into space. A separate tube loop delivers fresh oxygen across the astronaut’s face, continuously washing away exhaled carbon dioxide. That gas then routes back through the life-support system’s CO2 scrubber before oxygen recirculates to the crew member.

A key engineering feature distinguishes the Axiom LCVG from legacy cooling designs: a fully redundant cooling circuit. If the primary water loop fails, a backup system is available to engage.

Prada contributed expertise in engineered knitting, advanced 3D modeling techniques, and the sourcing of specialized fibers engineered for repeated use across long-duration missions. The fashion house’s role extended beyond materials: its patternmaking knowledge shaped how the network of tubes is distributed across the garment to maintain uniform cooling.

Dr. Jonathan Cirtain, Axiom Space CEO and president, said the partnership produced something neither company could have built independently. “The future of space exploration will not be built by any one entity alone, and our partnership with Prada is proof of that,” Cirtain said. “By bringing together the best in both aerospace engineering as well as luxury craftsmanship and advanced product development, we have developed a garment that neither company could have created independently, and that is exactly the kind of cross-industry thinking that will define the next era of human spaceflight.”

Lorenzo Bertelli, Prada Group Chief Marketing Officer and Head of Sustainability, described the LCVG as “a new achievement born from the unique combination of Axiom Space’s pioneering expertise and Prada’s know-how in design, patternmaking, and advanced materials, ahead of humanity’s return to the lunar surface.”

Russell Ralston, Axiom Space SVP of Spacecraft Development, described what the garment has to accomplish on every outing. “Every minute astronauts spend outside their vehicle, the LCVG is working to keep them safe,” Ralston said. “It manages their thermal environment, supports their breathing, and does it all while they’re pushing their bodies to the limit. The work we have done with Prada has taken that capability to a level we could not have achieved alone.”

The AxEMU is slated for use on NASA’s Artemis IV mission, which would mark the first crewed lunar landing since Apollo 17 in December 1972, more than 50 years ago.

(Source: Axiom Space news release. Image provided)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

Four astronauts have been assigned to Artemis III, a two-week Earth orbit test mission scheduled for 2027 that will demonstrate rendezvous and docking operations with commercial lunar landers from Blue Origin and SpaceX.

The crew will include NASA astronaut Randy Bresnik as commander, ESA astronaut Luca Parmitano as pilot, and NASA astronauts Frank Rubio and Andre Douglas as mission specialists. NASA astronaut Bob Hines was named backup commander and will train alongside the prime crew.

The announcement came during a live event Tuesday at Johnson Space Center, identifying the mission as a critical step toward Artemis IV the first planned crewed landing at the lunar South Pole, targeted for 2028. The Artemis III crew will launch aboard NASA’s Space Launch System rocket from Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman gave an overview of the mission.

Isaacman VSOT (See Transcript)

The crew will begin training immediately on Orion systems and will assist in development and operations of both the SpaceX and Blue Origin lander test articles.

-0-

York Space Systems has closed its approximately $67 million cash and stock acquisition of Solestial ... a Tempe, Arizona-based manufacturer of silicon solar cells engineered for the space environment. The transaction closed June 4th. York paid using a negotiated share value of $34.00 per unit, issuing more than 1.7 million shares of its common stock to Solestial’s sellers.

The deal targets a supply chain vulnerability York says runs through the core of the satellite manufacturing industry. China controls 99% of the gallium and more than 60% of the germanium required for the legacy III-V solar cells used in most spacecraft today. It also produces 93% of the world’s polysilicon used in terrestrial solar panels. Approximately 95% of Solestial’s supply chain is already U.S.-based. Solestial will operate as a wholly owned subsidiary of York and will continue supplying solar technology to external customers outside York’s own portfolio.

-0-

The Federal Communications Commission’s Space Bureau has opened two new processing rounds. The rounds cover non-geostationary orbit satellite systems seeking authority to operate in Ku-, Ka-, and V-band frequencies with a July 6th, 2026 deadline for new applicants. The bureau released the public notice June 5th.

Three operators already hold conditional authorizations folded into these proceedings: SpaceX, Amazon Leo, and Logos Space Services. A fourth operator, SN Space Systems, has an application pending from the second V-band processing round that also requested Ku- and Ka-band authorization. The FCC has not set a deadline for acting on applications filed in the third processing rounds.

-0-

And are SPACs making a comeback? A merger agreement announced Monday values Rockville, Maryland-based spacecraft developer Quantum Space at $1.2 billion post-transaction. The company is set to go public through a combination with special purpose acquisition company Inflection Point Acquisition Corp.

The merged entity will operate under the Quantum Space name and is expected to list on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “QSPC” pending shareholder approval and an anticipated close in the fourth quarter of 2026. Quantum Space has raised $57 million in equity funding to date, including a $40 million Series A extension closed in June of last year. The company’s Ranger 500 spacecraft completed a Manufacturing Readiness Review in late 2025.

-0-

SpaceX flew Starship Version 3 for the first time last week, and the launch cost equation for commercial payload customers shifted with it. [Paywall]

The test flight, designated Flight 12, launched from a newly constructed second launch pad at SpaceX’s Starbase facility in southern Texas. It deployed 20 Starlink simulator satellites on a suborbital trajectory over approximately 10 minutes. SpaceX said ahead of the flight it did not anticipate a flawless test. Post-flight, the company confirmed the V3 ship stage completed its planned suborbital trajectory but the Super Heavy booster did not return to the launch site as planned.

The architecture behind V3 is a structural redesign. The booster now uses three larger grid fins, an integrated hot-staging design, and a new interstage configuration SpaceX calls its Block 3. The company states V3 is designed to carry approximately 200 metric tons to low Earth orbit in fully reusable configuration and roughly 400 metric tons in expendable configuration.

To put that in context: SpaceX’s original Starship required an expendable vehicle to reach 200 metric tons. The V3 reusable rating matches that number. That means a customer flying on a reused V3 vehicle accesses the same mass budget that early Starship variants could only achieve by expending the vehicle.

Third-party analytics group Payload Research estimated Starship’s internal cost per kilogram in an expendable V1 configuration at approximately $500. Under V3’s advertised capacity, that same analytical framework suggests the per-kilogram number could fall by roughly half. Those are third-party projections. SpaceX has not published a V3 commercial rate card.

The commercial payload certification timeline for V3 has not been announced. Neither has the timeline for non-Starlink, non-Starshield cargo access to the vehicle.

-0-

Impulse Space closed a $500 million Series D on June 2nd, bringing its total capital raised to more than $1 billion and the supply chain behind that ambition is still being built. [Paywall]

The round was co-led by 137 Ventures and BANNER VC, with participation from Founders Fund, Lux Capital, and Linse Capital. The funds are earmarked for vehicles, propulsion systems, and operational architecture, a broad mandate that signals Impulse is actively expanding its manufacturing and supply base.

Impulse operates two distinct vehicle programs. Mira, the company’s last-mile maneuvering spacecraft for low Earth orbit, has flown multiple operational missions, delivering satellites from rideshare drop points to their final orbital destinations. Its propulsion, avionics, and structural sub-tiers are either qualified or actively in qualification, indicating a supply chain in execution mode.

Helios is a different story. The Helios kick stage is designed for geosynchronous orbit rideshare and deep-space transfer requiring substantially higher-thrust chemical propulsion, larger propellant tanks, and thermal management hardware that Mira does not need. As of June 2026, Helios has not flown. Its sub-tier qualification chain remains open.

That opening is the primary supply chain opportunity this raise signals.

The Series D’s explicit call-out of propulsion systems as a fund deployment target confirms that Helios’s propulsion architecture is still being finalized and sourced. For suppliers of high-thrust bipropellant engines, composite overwrapped pressure vessels known as COPVs and GEO-class thermal management systems, this is a defined qualification window. Suppliers with existing COPV credentials, including Arde, a Moog subsidiary with flight-heritage high-pressure vessels, and Steelhead Composites, a Colorado-based manufacturer with LEO constellation heritage, represent the vendor class for which that window is most directly relevant.

There’s also a defense layer. Impulse is working as a subcontractor to Anduril Industries on the Space Force’s space-based interceptor prototype for Golden Dome, a team that also includes K2 Space, Inversion Space, Voyager Technologies, and Sandia National Labs. That relationship adds defense-grade guidance, navigation, and control requirements to Impulse’s avionics stack. Radiation-hardened flight computers are now part of the qualification picture.

And those parts face supply pressure across the entire defense space sector. Suppliers currently qualified on SpaceX, Rocket Lab, or Millennium Space Systems programs hold a meaningful head start. For others, early engagement with Impulse’s supply chain team should be considered a prerequisite.

NASA awarded two Lunar Terrain Vehicle contracts on May 26th. The headline is which companies won. The story for supply chain leaders is the procurement architecture behind the awards. [Paywall]

Venturi Astrolab received a contract to produce its FLEX rover. Lunar Outpost received a contract for its MAPP rover. Both awards fall under NASA’s Artemis campaign. Combined, they represent approximately $440 million in potential contract value.

Neither award is a single-delivery purchase order. Both were structured as indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts meaning NASA retains the right to issue task orders across a defined ordering period, with total contract value contingent on task order activity rather than fixed at award. That IDIQ structure signals NASA is building a recurring acquisition framework for sustained lunar surface capability, not issuing a one-time purchase.

The rover contracts are one procurement layer in a five-domain architecture. NASA currently has active procurement activity or announced intent across surface mobility, surface power, surface communications, in-situ resource utilization, and surface habitat. Of those five domains, only surface mobility has named prime awards fully in place as of June 2026.

The Fission Surface Power program co-developed with the Department of Energy is the most time-urgent open window. Phase 1 design contracts went to Battelle Energy Alliance, IX, a joint venture between X-energy and Intuitive Machines, and Lockheed Martin in June 2023. Phase 2 awards for flight hardware have not been announced. The sub-tier qualification window for flight-rated fission power components, shielding materials, and heat rejection systems is open now.

There is also a timing issue for the LTV program specifically. Venturi Astrolab and Lunar Outpost have each disclosed technical partnerships and supply relationships in filings dating 18 to 24 months before the May 26th announcement. The propulsion, power storage, mobility actuation, and avionics sub-tiers for those vehicles are substantially determined. New entrants positioning for the rover supply chain are not competing for the current award cycle. They are positioning for the next one and the procurement horizon for LTV-2 has not been publicly announced.

Supply chain leaders who treat the May 26th announcement as the signal to begin qualification are, by definition, already behind.

-0-

Defense buyers are no longer writing Earth observation contracts around best-efforts delivery. Guaranteed cadence is now a contract requirement, and that shift carries direct consequences for every tier of the EO supply chain. [Paywall]

On May 26th, Satellogic announced an $18 million contract with an international defense customer for persistent, high-frequency Earth observation monitoring. The contract runs one year. The meaningful detail isn’t the dollar value. It’s what the customer required: a collection frequency obligation written directly into the contract. Satellogic’s constellation architecture, downlink infrastructure, and processing throughput are now contractual commitments.

And that award isn’t an outlier. In February, the National Reconnaissance Office confirmed the first tranche of contracts under its Strategic Commercial Enhancements Commercial Solutions Opening program, selecting HEO, SatVu, and Sierra Nevada Corporation to supply non-Earth-imaging, medium-wave infrared, and radio frequency sensing capabilities. In May, the NRO added ICEYE US to that panel under a subsequent award, expanding qualified suppliers to include synthetic aperture radar imaging.

Together, those awards establish something more significant than individual contract values: defense buyers are broadening the phenomenology set they procure commercially. A persistent intelligence delivery contract now routinely bundles optical, infrared, RF, and SAR sensing into a single program architecture. The prime contractor that wins such a contract needs a credible subcontract structure behind it for every sensor type.

That sub-tier architecture is where the current sourcing whitespace lives.

The ground segment is the layer that is neither disqualified nor confirmed across any of these award structures. Downlink throughput, antenna access schedules, and processing pipeline capacity are structural requirements in a persistent delivery contract. Providers including Leaf Space, Atlas Space Operations, and Amazon Web Services Ground Station, represent the mapped starting point for ground-segment dependencies. But contractors building teams for persistent EO awards who have not pre-qualified a ground-segment partner are building an incomplete proposal.

The NRO has indicated additional 2026 award tranches are anticipated. The window to build the program office relationships that convert a panel qualification into delivery orders closes before a solicitation is formally posted.

Worth a Second Look

Goodyear to Supply Tires for NASA’s Artemis Lunar Terrain Vehicle

First Wild Strawberries to Be Grown in Orbit Under ISS Agriculture Contract

Satellite Flood Intelligence Tapped for Florida Hurricane Preparedness

Vertical Integration as Brand Strategy [Paywall]

Europe Charts Road Map for Domestic Plutonium-238 Production [Paywall]

Theme Stock Music “Interesting Facts” Provided by Pond 5

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

The Signal: A Regulation That Reaches Beyond Its Borders

When the European Commission released the EU Space Act progress report on May 8, 2026, most of the industry commentary landed on the headline provisions: a unified licensing framework, orbital slot coordination, and sustainability rules for deorbiting. The cybersecurity chapter drew comparatively little attention.

That is a pricing error.

The cybersecurity provisions embedded in the current draft represent a structural shift in how liability attaches to space-derived services, and they do so through a mechanism that most U.S.-headquartered operators have not fully internalized. The Act does not limit its reach to EU-registered entities. It reaches any operator whose services are consumed in EU territory, a market-access standard borrowed directly from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) enforcement playbook. The EU used that playbook to impose compliance obligations on companies headquartered in California, Texas, and New York. It intends to use the same logic for space.

The EU Space Act is not yet in force. It remains in the legislative process, with further regulatory clarity expected from the Competitiveness Council this window. But the regulatory trajectory is clear enough that operators and their legal teams should be running exposure assessments now, before service contracts lock in terms that will be costly to renegotiate.

What the Draft Actually Says: Three Provisions That Create Liability

The cybersecurity chapter of the EU Space Act draft, specifically the proposal under active Competitiveness Council review as referenced in the Commission’s May 8, 2026 progress report, contains three interlocking provisions that together create a liability surface significantly broader than existing frameworks. Readers seeking to validate these provisions against the legislative text should consult the Commission’s published progress documentation and the associated European Parliament committee materials, as the specific COM reference number for the final consolidated draft was not available in publicly accessible Commission documents as of the research cutoff date of June 2026.

Provision One: Security-by-Design Mandates for Market Access.

The draft imposes security-by-design requirements as a condition of market authorization. Any operator seeking to provide space-derived services in EU markets must demonstrate, at the point of licensing, that cybersecurity controls are integrated into the system architecture, not bolted on after deployment. The implication for existing constellation operators is direct: systems designed and launched before the regulation enters force would need to undergo compliance assessment against a standard that did not exist when the hardware was built. For operators with multi-year satellite lifetimes, that is not a software patch problem. It is a system architecture problem.

The draft delegates the specific technical standards to implementing acts, meaning the precise requirements will be defined through secondary legislation after the primary regulation passes. That delegation is common in EU regulatory design, but it creates a compliance planning challenge: operators must build readiness for a standard whose technical specifications are still being written.

Read more

A $500 million Series D funding round has been closed by Impulse Space, the Redondo Beach, California-based in-space mobility company, pushing its total capital raised to more than $1 billion.

The round was co-led by 137 Ventures and BANNER VC. Additional participants include Founders Fund, Lux Capital, and Linse Capital. Impulse said it will use the proceeds to expand manufacturing capacity and grow its workforce, which has more than doubled over the past year.

The company currently has more than 200 open positions spanning propulsion, avionics, autonomy, spacecraft systems, manufacturing, and mission operations. Facilities include offices in Redondo Beach and Boulder, Colorado, a government affairs presence in Washington, D.C., and a growing test complex in Mojave, California.

Impulse designs, builds, and operates spacecraft and propulsion systems engineered specifically for movement after launch — orbital transfers, repositioning, and rendezvous and proximity operations. The company has flown three missions and holds hundreds of millions of dollars in customer contracts across commercial, civil, and government sectors.

“We’re building more than spacecraft: we’re building the economic and technical engine that will power humanity’s expansion into space,” said Tom Mueller, founder and CEO of Impulse Space. “From Earth orbit to the Moon and beyond, the ability to move quickly, precisely, and affordably on orbit is the fundamental capability that will unlock a true space age.”

The company’s current fleet includes Mira, a precision maneuvering spacecraft that has executed multiple missions including record orbit changes and autonomous rendezvous operations, and Helios, a high-energy kick stage scheduled for first flight in 2027. Helios is designed to move payloads from low Earth orbit to medium Earth orbit, geostationary orbit, heliocentric trajectories, and lunar destinations on timelines and at costs the company says are substantially lower than conventional approaches.

Alongside its spacecraft, Impulse is developing three propulsion systems: Saiph, for precision maneuvering and orbital repositioning; Deneb, for high-energy long-distance transport; and Rigel, a throttleable engine for applications including landers and responsive maneuvering. A Caravan rideshare program is also designed to reduce the cost of access to higher-energy orbits such as geostationary.

The company’s investors framed the round as a bet on post-launch mobility as a structural gap in the existing space supply chain.

“Tom helped transform access to space at SpaceX, and now he’s tackling the industry’s next major challenge: in-space mobility,” said Justin Fishner-Wolfson, Managing Partner at 137 Ventures. “Mobility in space is strategic and will define the next phase of the space economy, and Impulse is building the infrastructure to make that possible.”

Adam Ramada, Managing Partner at BANNER VC, said the round reflects a broader shift in how operators are thinking about orbital architecture. “As activity in orbit increases, in-space mobility becomes foundational,” Ramada said. “Impulse is building the infrastructure that enables the next layer of growth for the space economy.”

Mueller, who previously served as SpaceX’s first Vice President of Propulsion, founded Impulse in 2021. The company’s Mira spacecraft has demonstrated autonomous rendezvous and proximity operations — capabilities increasingly sought by both commercial operators and government customers for satellite servicing, inspection, and deployment missions.

Eric Romo, President and COO of Impulse Space, said the funding positions the company to meet demand without slowing execution. “Demand for in-space mobility is exceptionally high, and we’re growing our team and production to address it head on,” Romo said.

The next scheduled milestone is the first flight of the Helios kick stage in 2027.

(Source: Impulse Space news release. Image from file)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce

More than 20 tactical communications satellites built by York Space Systems have begun shipment to the launch site for a dedicated Falcon 9 mission planned for this summer.

The shipment marks completion of York’s second production lot under the Tranche 1 Transport Layer contract — the second time the Denver-based company has delivered a full batch of operational national security spacecraft for the Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture (PWSA). The PWSA is a U.S. Space Force program designed to provide resilient, tactical communications for U.S. and allied military forces through a proliferated constellation of satellites in low Earth orbit.

The more than 20 satellites in this second lot will fill the complete payload of a dedicated Falcon 9. That rocket is the second Falcon 9 launched exclusively for York under the program. No launch date or launch facility has been announced.

“Shipping a second production lot for this important tactical communications mission demonstrates the repeatability and maturity of York’s production model,” said Melanie Preisser, vice president and General Manager of York Space Systems. “We have shown that operational national security space capabilities can be built and fielded rapidly, affordably, and at the scale that the USG demands.”

York was the first Tranche 1 performer to ship and launch satellites from its initial production lot. All spacecraft from that first batch were confirmed operational within hours of launch separation, the company said. The constellation has since passed additional on-orbit milestones as it moves through early operations. Combined, the two production lots represent more than 40 York-built spacecraft delivered under the contract.

York says it completed both lots at half the cost of competitors. The company did not identify those competitors or provide an independent cost comparison in its announcement.

The PWSA’s Transport Layer is the communications tier of the architecture. It is intended to provide the secure, tactical data links that U.S. and allied forces need for operations across land, sea, air, and space domains. The Space Force is building the constellation with multiple commercial prime contractors, each under separate Tranche 1 contracts. York says it has now twice completed its production lot before any of its fellow Tranche 1 primes.

That sequencing matters for a program built around the premise that commercial industry can produce and field national security hardware faster and at lower cost than traditional defense contractors. Whether the other Tranche 1 performers will contest York’s timeline claim has not been addressed publicly.

York Space Systems went public on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker YSS. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado, and describes itself as a national defense and commercial prime contractor.

“Most importantly, these spacecraft will provide operational capability to the warfighter, supporting the enduring need for resilient tactical communications and infrastructure needed for modern military operations,” Preisser said.

The first lot of York satellites has been providing operational support to U.S. and allied forces since completing early operations. The second lot is intended to expand that coverage once the Falcon 9 delivers the spacecraft to orbit this summer.

The Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture draws its name from the strategy of fielding so many satellites that no adversary could neutralize the network by targeting individual spacecraft. The Transport Layer is one of several tiers in that architecture, alongside sensing and data transport functions handled by other contractors and programs.

York’s back-to-back production completions come as the Space Force continues to press commercial industry to demonstrate the sustained production rates needed to maintain and grow the constellation over time. The program’s operational value depends not on any single launch, but on the ability of prime contractors to repeatedly replenish the on-orbit fleet as satellites age or are lost.

The summer launch, once completed, will mark York’s second contribution to the on-orbit layer of the PWSA — and the second test of whether the company’s satellites can replicate the rapid health confirmation seen after the first mission.

(Source: York Space Systems news release. Image provided)

Subscribe now

Share

Share The Journal of Space Commerce